Acquisition Next, A Playbook to Break Industrial Age Paradigm

In This Story

People Mentioned in This Story
Body

FAIRFAX, VA - The Center for Government Contracting at George Mason University today announced the results of a year-long research project to identify Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition best practices in an effort to improve the way the government and industry work together.

As Center Executive Director Dr. Jerry McGinn noted, “We worked to identify the practices that acquisition professionals and their industry counterparts can use now to innovate, iterate, scale, and field effective military capabilities for United States forces. Many of these practices are being used in programs, but widespread adoption will help drive culture change across the acquisition community.”

The defense acquisition system is a vital component to strategic competition with Russia and China. Future outcomes depend on the actions of acquisition professionals today. Government programs can become leaders in innovation again, but it requires a change in mindset and approach the Center calls Acquisition Next:

  • Acquisition Next translates buzzwords into business practices that people can use
  • Acquisition Next accelerates capability delivery and technology adoption
  • Acquisition Next enables a highly composable joint force design
Acquisition Next, A Playbook to Break Industrial Age Paradigm
Download the Playbook

This playbook suggests a way to implement the Acquisition Next mindset. It distills the research into six plays designed to spur modularity, speed, iteration, and competition in defense acquisition. The first three apply at the total program level and to all system types. They enable the second three plays which are suited to contracts with software intensive content.

Program Level Plays

1. Requirements. Make room for opportunities in program requirements
2. Market Research. Make market intelligence a core and continuous organizational capability
3. Master the Baseline. Tailor the contracting approach to technically separable elements

Software Intensive Plays

4. Agile Work Statements. Separate technical direction from contract work statements
5. Modular Contracts. Reduce risk by partitioning contract tasks over time and components
6. Intellectual Property. Avoid vendor lock by deferring rights to interfaces and operational data

“As global threats continue to rise it is imperative that we address the key enablers of military power residing in our acquisition system,” said long-time Hill staffer and defense expert Bill Greenwalt. “The Center for Government Contracting has outlined a compelling acquisition framework that if implemented can begin to restore our national competitiveness and military capabilities.”

The Center looks forward to iterating on this playbook as researchers continue to engage with practitioners and embark on acquisition case studies. The goal is for this academic work to reflect empirical evidence and filter back into outcomes through advocacy, training, and pilot programs.

For comments or questions, please contact:

Jerry McGinn, Center Executive Director, jmcginn5@gmu.edu
Eric Lofgren, Center Fellow, elofgren@gmu.edu

Read the Acquisition Next report here.

The Center for Government Contracting, housed within the School of Business at George Mason University, is a nexus for government, industry, and academia to explore issues in government contracting. The Center is the first university-based organization to address business, policy, regulatory and other issues in government contracting through research, collaboration, and education and training.